#Hark a vagrant mr darcy movie
Hell, there’s a scene early on in the movie featuring an overturned cart full of lamp oil, and at no point does anybody blow it up. Again, this may be my own bias showing through, because I’m even more of a kung fu movie snob than a horror snob.
And on top of that, most of the fight choreography wasn’t all that impressive.
It’s a shame, too, as a lot of the zombie makeup is rather impressive- I bet the crew could’ve come up with some really gruesome bits if they had the chance. Darcy chop up a bunch of them with swords, but it never quite reaches the level of gory, gleeful insanity that feature in the best of zombie massacres. I mean, yes, there are zombies, and yes, Elizabeth Bennet and Mr. I understand PG-13 movies are the ones that actually make money these days, but I couldn’t help but envision the film that could have been, in which actors in gorgeous Regency-style costumes were showered in absolute buckets of fake blood. I may just be a horror snob, but I’m a big advocate of the R rating. Pride and Prejudice and Zombies also suffers from a PG-13 rating. I’m terrible and uncultured since most of my knowledge of Jane Austen comes from Hark! A Vagrant comics. If I had planned ahead, I would’ve picked one of said straight adaptations of Pride and Prejudice and done an Unfair Compare feature, but eh. It’s all filmed at various gorgeous English Manor Houses- I suppose they had strict rules not to get karo syrup all over everything. But after a somewhat promising start, there are long stretches of the movie where it looks like just another BBC period drama. Yes, there are zombies, and yes, Elizabeth Bennett is trained in zombie-killing kung fu. Unfortunately, the movie can’t keep this up. That’s the whole point of a gonzo mash-up piece like this, after all. The opening couple minutes are quite fun, with lots of cool visuals of a prim and proper period piece- surrounded by spiky wrought iron fences and cannons and stuff. The film is most interesting when it embraces the gonzo ‘Zombies and Jane Austen’ sensibility. Pride and Prejudice and Zombies has something of the opposite problem. The zombie and ninja bits were just shoehorned in, to the point where they broke up the flow of the book. It wasn’t surprising, considering Austen is one of the most famed and revered novelists in the English canon, where Grahame-Smith … isn’t. While I was reading the book, I found myself enjoying the Jane Austen segments much, much more than Seth Grahame-Smith’s. A couple years ago, I tried reading the book … and gave up about two thirds in (if that).
#Hark a vagrant mr darcy free
To be honest, it was a good thing this was a free pass, as I honestly wasn’t planning on seeing Pride and Prejudice and Zombies in the theater to begin with.
#Hark a vagrant mr darcy plus
By using plus signs instead of ampersands, it’s more of an equation than a title.
0 kommentar(er)
